Last week I had some time which allowed me to do some experiments with Microsoft Silverlight. I had to give it a try
since you hear so much on the web about it, so I was quite curious, how it works out.
When searching for a
tutorial, I watched a couple of videos and finally ended on Scott Guthrie's blog where he presents a "End-to-End
tutorial" of creating a Digg search client with Silverlight 2
. I followed the tutorial and it's great, since it
gives you quite a good feeling of the environment. The tutorial consists of the following eight parts:
And here's a screenshot of my outcome (basically the same as on Scott's tutorial obviously :) ):
was really impressed of the environment. And you know...as most of us probably do, I'm personally always aiming to
build highly user-friendly applications because at the end that's what counts, since that's the point where your users
interact with your application. When we talk about web applications and user-friendliness, most often we have to speak
about high-responsiveness of the web application, which again - on the web - is strongly connected with Ajax.
Traditional Asp.net applications don't give you this value. Having the page refreshing on each action is somehow
annoying because the user has to continuously wait till he sees the user interface again for being able to continue and
this is somehow distracting.
What regards Ajax technologies, Google is for sure one of the leaders in that
field. They are able to build highly-interactive web applications (i.e. Gmail
, Google Maps
,...) which don't feel any more like web applications but more like
normal desktop apps. I did a couple of experiments also with the GWT
(Google Web Toolkit)
which allows you to program (quite) normal Java code which then gets translated into pure
running on the browser that communicate with some server over web service calls (using XML, Json,...) or even with RPC
(remote procedure calls). Programming GWT is cool and there are a couple of good online tutorials. Everything is
perfectly integrated into Eclipse
, and you can even debug (!!) your application,
webserver. If you then combine your GWT client with advanced web frameworks like the Spring Web MVC framework you get
even more benefits out of it. Although it is possible, that process of letting GWT communicate with your Spring
application framework through GWT RPC calls is not that easy (I may post a short tutorial on that on some later posts).
The point with GWT, as with most Java technologies, is the learning curve. You need to investigate quite a lot
initially to really become productive (especially in designing good user-interfaces and user-interface components).
why did I mention GWT? Well because Silverlight seems to be somehow Microsoft's answer to it. Well not exactly because
it is more similar to Flash than the GWT, but it is Microsoft's trial to provide a framework for easily developing
highly interactive web applications. You can build Silverlight applications by using XAML files and the .Net framework.
So you don't have to learn anything new and that will be one of the major advantages. Another point which is really
cool, is how easily you can bind object properties on your interface (inside the XAML file). Scott Guthrie's tutorial
points this out. The best is that you try the tutorial to get a feeling of Silverlight.
If you compare
Silverlight with GWT from the point of the prerequisites which you need to run the different kind of applications, GWT
to download the framework to the client first (similar to Flash, where you first have to install the Flash Player).
a "productivity" point of view, I think Silverlight will be better, but it very much depends on the situation. If you
start from scratch, Silverlight will for sure be better, due to the Microsoft "visual" way of programming. You have
your designer, where you can quickly compose several predefined components. By using Microsoft Expression Blend,
designing UI's will even be more easy. Also the rendering of the object-data on the UI is straightforward due to the
implemented data-binding mechanism. Moreover you can nearly continue programming like you were accustomed when building
normal Asp.net apps. Here, GWT is (initially) a bit more complicated. For programming you can only use a subset of the
continuously implement the new Java features into their compiler. Designing the UI is a bit awkward. You have to keep a
good overview and impose a good structure, by creating UI components which again you combine on the UI s.t. everything
remains flexible and exchangeable. As I mentioned, this will produce some overhead, since initially you spend quite a
lot of time in producing good UI's. Once you have your components, you may reuse them however on your other GWT apps.
Unfortunately there don't exist any predefined "visual editors" for GWT integrated in Eclipse. Instantiations
however provides one (you have to pay it), but I never tried it out. Another "disadvantage" is the databinding
mechanism (binding your object-data to the UI). You have to create a data-binding mechanism yourself. There doesn't
exist anything like in Silverlight. MVC
works out well here, and again, if you design your components in an intelligent and smart way, you're able to reuse
them. The prerequisite here is that you have a good understanding of such design patterns as MVC, observer, mediator
etc...everything it includes basically. In Silverlight you can get rid of these details which from a productive point
of view may be an advantage, from a learning point of view however you loose some interesting aspects.
take this comparison too seriously, it's just a really informal description of what I experienced somehow...to do a
better job, one would have to really program the same sample app with Silverlight and GWT and extract some metrics.
speaking, I think that Silverlight is as most of Microsofts technologies. Microsoft provides you with great and
powerful tools, where you can quickly build and set-up a running application, possibly already connected to some
datasource. But that may be also a dangerous part, these "fast" solutions may not always be optimal from an
architectural point of view, but again that would be enough stuff for another post (which may come :) ).
concluding this post now, it already became too long...btw with this post is number 100 for this year :D
you Merry Christmas!!References:Install
tools for Visual Studio 2008GWT main sitehttp://code.google.com/webtoolkit/app_gallery.html
Questions? Thoughts? Hit me up on Twitter